Bus Bars Protection
1. Single Bus Bar
The schematic chart of a solitary busbar framework is introduced in fig.1. Before examining about this framework, some critical ideas are characterized underneath:
The single busbar framework introduced in fig.1 utilizes two detaches switches, and an electrical switch every feeder. If there should arise an occurrence of a feeder blame, the electrical switch confines the feeder. In the same way, the breaker is utilized to switch on and off the stacked feeder. The distinction switch on both sides of the breaker are utilized to confine the breaker for repair. The distinction switches are correspondingly utilized for bringing as a part of the breaker to the dead feeder. The distinction switch on the feeder side of the breaker may be overlooked, if there is no other wellspring of era, nourishing the heap, which is accepting a parallel supply from the busbar under thought.
The single busbar framework has the accompanying
Focal points
1. Basic outline.
2. Moderately modest.
3. Effectively transferred (control).
4. Least Cost.
6. Low accessibility.
Weaknesses
a.)The supply from the busbar is hindered amid the routine support of the busbar framework and disengages switches associated with it.
b.)Feeder supply is lost amid the repair and upkeep of the feeder, breaker, and the distinction switches.
c.)Short circuits in the busbar lead to the loss of supply to all the feeders.
d.)Feeder short circuits in the event of electrical switch disappointment lead to loss of supply to all feeders.
2.Main And Transfer Bus Bar
Typically bus bar deficiency is extremely uncommon where as normal upkeep of electrical switch must be completed habitually. Essentially the issue in electrical switch is likewise regular. In this framework, in a bad position in any of the breakers, the standby breaker with mix of exchange bus can be utilized for ordinary operation.
The primary peculiarities of principle and exchange bus are as per the following:
Points of interest
1. Medium expense.
2. Adaptable operation.
3. Breaker or line transfers can be taken out of administration whenever for upkeep and with just slight adjustments to line security.
4. Potential gadget on principle bus can be utilized for handing-off.
Hindrances
1. Inconsistent (bus or breaker flaw close down the substation).
2. Requires an additional breaker for bus tie.
3.bus sudden death round transferring confused since it may save any line breaker.
4. Exchanging convoluted when evacuating a breaker for upkeep.
5. Obliges separate bus insurance plan.
3) Double bus single breaker
The plan is costlier yet has higher unwavering quality than other two plans
Assume force stream is currently in course from source-1 to source-2. For this situation bus 1 is charged through CB-2, DS-1 and DS-4. In the event that blame happens in line of source -2, it is detached by opening CB-4
furthermore DS-2. Additionally if there should be an occurrence of support of Bus-1, Bus-2 is charged through bus coupler by shutting DS-5, DS-10 and CB-5 .Both the buses now are at same potential. Source-1 can supply Bus-2 through DS-11 furthermore the heap can be joined with bus 2 through DS-12 securely. Presently DS-3, DS-4, DS-5 and CB-5 can be opened. Comparable operations can be performed at source-2 side. Furthermore thus upkeep at Bus-1 can be performed securely.
The fundamental peculiarities of this plan are as per the following:
Focal points
1. Adaptable operation.
2. Probability of keeping up a busbar at once without the loss of supply.
3. Breaker or line transfers can be taken out of administration whenever with just slight alteration of line insurance.
4. Either fundamental bus may be separated for support.
Hindrances
An additional breaker is needed for the bus tie.
2.Fault in the sudden death round debilitates both bus bars
3.Complicated exchanging obliged when evacuating a breaker for support.
4.Bus sudden death round transferring convoluted since it must have the capacity to extra any breaker.
5.Requires different entangled bus defensive plan.
6.High expense.
7.Loss of supply of comparing feeder amid upkeep of that feeder.
1. Single Bus Bar
The schematic chart of a solitary busbar framework is introduced in fig.1. Before examining about this framework, some critical ideas are characterized underneath:
The single busbar framework introduced in fig.1 utilizes two detaches switches, and an electrical switch every feeder. If there should arise an occurrence of a feeder blame, the electrical switch confines the feeder. In the same way, the breaker is utilized to switch on and off the stacked feeder. The distinction switch on both sides of the breaker are utilized to confine the breaker for repair. The distinction switches are correspondingly utilized for bringing as a part of the breaker to the dead feeder. The distinction switch on the feeder side of the breaker may be overlooked, if there is no other wellspring of era, nourishing the heap, which is accepting a parallel supply from the busbar under thought.
The single busbar framework has the accompanying
Focal points
1. Basic outline.
2. Moderately modest.
3. Effectively transferred (control).
4. Least Cost.
6. Low accessibility.
Weaknesses
a.)The supply from the busbar is hindered amid the routine support of the busbar framework and disengages switches associated with it.
b.)Feeder supply is lost amid the repair and upkeep of the feeder, breaker, and the distinction switches.
c.)Short circuits in the busbar lead to the loss of supply to all the feeders.
d.)Feeder short circuits in the event of electrical switch disappointment lead to loss of supply to all feeders.
2.Main And Transfer Bus Bar
Typically bus bar deficiency is extremely uncommon where as normal upkeep of electrical switch must be completed habitually. Essentially the issue in electrical switch is likewise regular. In this framework, in a bad position in any of the breakers, the standby breaker with mix of exchange bus can be utilized for ordinary operation.
The primary peculiarities of principle and exchange bus are as per the following:
Points of interest
1. Medium expense.
2. Adaptable operation.
3. Breaker or line transfers can be taken out of administration whenever for upkeep and with just slight adjustments to line security.
4. Potential gadget on principle bus can be utilized for handing-off.
Hindrances
1. Inconsistent (bus or breaker flaw close down the substation).
2. Requires an additional breaker for bus tie.
3.bus sudden death round transferring confused since it may save any line breaker.
4. Exchanging convoluted when evacuating a breaker for upkeep.
5. Obliges separate bus insurance plan.
3) Double bus single breaker
The plan is costlier yet has higher unwavering quality than other two plans
Assume force stream is currently in course from source-1 to source-2. For this situation bus 1 is charged through CB-2, DS-1 and DS-4. In the event that blame happens in line of source -2, it is detached by opening CB-4
furthermore DS-2. Additionally if there should be an occurrence of support of Bus-1, Bus-2 is charged through bus coupler by shutting DS-5, DS-10 and CB-5 .Both the buses now are at same potential. Source-1 can supply Bus-2 through DS-11 furthermore the heap can be joined with bus 2 through DS-12 securely. Presently DS-3, DS-4, DS-5 and CB-5 can be opened. Comparable operations can be performed at source-2 side. Furthermore thus upkeep at Bus-1 can be performed securely.
The fundamental peculiarities of this plan are as per the following:
Focal points
1. Adaptable operation.
2. Probability of keeping up a busbar at once without the loss of supply.
3. Breaker or line transfers can be taken out of administration whenever with just slight alteration of line insurance.
4. Either fundamental bus may be separated for support.
Hindrances
An additional breaker is needed for the bus tie.
2.Fault in the sudden death round debilitates both bus bars
3.Complicated exchanging obliged when evacuating a breaker for support.
4.Bus sudden death round transferring convoluted since it must have the capacity to extra any breaker.
5.Requires different entangled bus defensive plan.
6.High expense.
7.Loss of supply of comparing feeder amid upkeep of that feeder.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)

